![]() ![]() The main reasons for this were overwhelming complexity to meet demands and inability to keep up with quality standards for all customers. In addition, users could submit their designs to The Lego Company itself and receive a box with all the pieces necessary to complete the model, and the instructions needed to build it. LEGO announced in November of 2011 that this delivery service would be discontinued on January 16, 2012. A key advantage of this is the scope of projects is not limited by the number of particular bricks on hand. In my personal experience 4.3.11 is the best version - definitely not 4.3.12.Developed and officially released by the LEGO group in 2004, Lego digital designer is a software tool that allows the user to model and prototype a LEGO creation by placing bricks on a canvas and creating their own designs. This botched update certainly did confuse / drive away alot of LDD users and Lego didn't care Get the setupldd-pc -4_3_11.exe version of LDD To make things worse, a simple uninstall of the botched version and re-install of the good 4.3.11 will not help, as the 4.3.12 uninstall will keep files and also messing with the install of the good version.ĭelete this folder also (otherwise a reinstall will not work):Ĭ:\Users\ \AppData\Roaming\LEGO Company\LEGO Digital Designer After intallation it reports 4.3.11, but with a different parts library version. The thing is, its only the installer which is name 4_3_12. Isn't the 4.3.11 version the "bad" one, basically the same as 4.3.10 (which might make more sense to share), but with a failing online check at the beginning?Ĥ.3.12 has a bad parts library and is missing a lot of parts. Lego owns high-res models of every part, but can't bother making them available in their own tools? Something that bugs me about Studio btw, and it's the same think with Bricklink, Lego now owns both, and yet it's still the community that maintains models & part inventories. Some stuff, like rotating parts that goes backwards, the very different sorting of parts, the different part snapping, the tube bending even more broken than it is in the LDD, one may argue that it's not bad, just different & annoying for LDD users. I wish Studio had an "LDD workflow" option, because IMHO it's a great tool, critical for at least renders & manual, but it just can't beat the speed of the LDD as long as the things we spend the most time on, take a lot more time than in the LDD.Īnd it's mainly about moving around your model, which the LDD does a lot better because right-click re-centers. It just officialized something we already all knew, anyway. Which, as time goes by, seems to become less impossible with time )Īnd do think about what to do. Just keep on doing what you are doing and try to either conserve or try to carry over the impossible. what does it mean to you: TLG announces this, and than that? They can announce the end of The World and I would simply not believe it "so what", I'd say. Actually DOS6.X is doing fine on this laptop. Well, there are basically uncountable nerds out there - old people ) - who just don't accept the phrase: It does not work anymore in Win XYZ. ![]() and everything else in on my Win10/11 laptop. There are now three laptops I did not ditch: One is running Win98 - the version fully compatible with DOS 6.X. It appears as if hardware needs to live or go with operating systems - at least in the Windows World I am living in. Why not conserving everything as it is? This what I am doing: Whenever this happens - or I fear it may happen (and it only has happened twice to me) I have a serious look at my hardware. I have tried studio and don't like it / understand it, and converting all 5,540 LDD files I have is impossible. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |